Protect Nashville’s E. S. Rose Park

Urgent Action Needed:

Ask the Parks Board to Protect Nashville’s E.S. Rose Park

Belmont University plans to present to the Metro Board of Parks and Recreation this Tuesday, September 4, a proposal supporting the university’s plans to built a two-story athletics (indoor batting facility) and office building in Nashville’s E.S. Rose Park and guaranteeing Belmont’s primary use of the building for over 30 years.

The Edgehill Neighborhood Coalition needs your support in asking the Metro Parks Board:

(1) to defer action on this proposal, and
(2) to honor a previous commitment for at least one community meeting.

The Metro Nashville Government approved an earlier proposal supporting Belmont’s plans in 2017. The building was misrepresented to Metro Council members and the Nashville public as a “batting cage structure,” and the process did not include any community meetings.

The Edgehill Neighborhood Coalition and others are trying to protect Rose Park and calling for an open process in decisions about the future of the park.

Urgent Action 1: Write to the Parks Board

The Metro Board of Parks and Recreation is scheduled to consider the Belmont building proposal at its meeting this Tuesday, September 4, at 12:00 noon.

Please email members of the Parks Board and your Council member by Tuesday morning in support of the Edgehill Neighborhood Coalition’s request to defer this proposal and to honor a commitment to hold at least one community meeting.

Include a clear subject line such as “Protect Rose Park” or “Defer Belmont’s building proposal.”

Metro Parks Policy 3000.29 on public-private partnerships reads in part:

“In order to ensure the public interest in creating such a public/private partnership, the staff of Parks and Recreation, in conjunction with the area council representatives, will hold a minimum of two community meetings to ascertain the need for services identified to validate the assumptions. Additionally, the council representatives should endorse the planned development.”

The Parks Department is aware of this policy but has written that community meetings are not legally required in the case of Belmont’s proposal to construct a building in a Nashville park. This logic would allow Belmont University to continue new building in E.S. Rose Park without any community input. Please ask the Parks Board to reconsider this position.

Email addresses:

Parks Board Members
Mr. George Anderson, Chairperson (
Mr. Stan Fossick, Vice-chairperson (
Dr. Michelle Steele (
Ms. Tari Hughes (
Ms. Susannah Scott-Barnes (
Ms. Jill Speering (
Mr. Jeff Haynes (

Metro Parks Director Monique Odom (
District 18 Council Member Burkley Allen, (
At-Large Council Member John Cooper, (
At-Large Council Member Erica Gilmore, (
District 19 Council Member Freddie O’Connell (
District 17 Council Member Colby Sledge, (

Urgent Action 2: Attend the Parks Board Meeting

The Parks Board meeting on Tuesday, September 4. at 12:00 noon will be held at 2565 Park Plaza.

Everyone in Nashville has the right to be concerned about the construction of a building by a private organization in one of our public parks, and everyone should have the right to speak in opposition to this proposal.

If possible, please attend the Parks Board meeting on Tuesday and let your voice be heard.

Stay involved

We are very grateful for support and ideas from anyone who cares about the Edgehill neighborhood and protecting Nashville’s parks.

You can join the Edgehill Neighborhood Coalition email list online if you would like to receive regular updates about Rose Park and Edgehill.

If you’re mainly interested Rose Park, please just send an email to, and we’ll only write to you about that.

Why we should protect Rose Park for Edgehill

The original proposal for a two-story Belmont building in Rose Park was absurd in financial terms ($417/month lease fixed for over 30 years), in the location of the building on or near the Fort Morton historic site overlooking downtown, and in the reservation of the second floor of a public building for private (Belmont) use.

The revised proposal has not been published, but available information, including Belmont’s presentation at the July 10 Parks Board meeting, indicates that changes include a small increase in the size of  the building, its proposed relocation to the south side of Rose Park, and an annual grant of over $24,000 in addition to the lease for at least part of its duration.

Writing about the revised proposal in his July 6 newsletter, Council Member Sledge stated:

“I’ll put it bluntly: I don’t expect this to garner a lot of community support, at least from those with whom I have conversed over the last year.”

Both proposals are bad for Edgehill. We do not want Belmont University to build further in our community park. We need to work toward the restoration of Rose Park as a family-friendly, community park rather than making this increasingly difficult or even impossible.

The Rose Park Athletics Complex has been designed for organized athletic events that one would expect to find on a university campus. It does not prioritize the purpose of a public park for free and open access for spontaneous play and recreation.

The need for Rose Park as green space is increasing with the growth of the Edgehill neighborhood, whose population is expected to increase 6-8-fold in the next 10 years. “Major open space centered on E.S. Rose Park, Reservoir Park and the former Murrell elementary” was Goal 1 of Edgehill’s 2005 Detailed Neighborhood Design Plan, and this goal is even more important today.

Why we should protect Rose Park for Nashville

Both proposals are also a bad move for Nashville, which is facing a crisis of public trust and urgently needs demonstrations of accountability and transparency in decisions regarding the use of public land.

Authorizing Belmont’s construction of an athletics building in Rose Park would be the only such decision by a city government in the United States that we are aware of. Columbia University’s plan to build a university gym in Harlem’s Morningside Park is a famous exception, but this was in 1968 and was not allowed to happen even then.

If Belmont is allowed to build an athletics facility in Rose Park, Metro Nashville will have established a precedent affirming:

(1) the Metro Government’s support for private organizations to construct buildings in Metro parks without community support,
(2) the leasing of park land for private use and office space,
(3) the allocation of space in Metro Parks buildings for exclusively private use (in this case half of the building for more than 30 years), and
(4) the claim that the Parks policy requirement for community meetings is not applicable in these cases.

E.S. Rose Park history

E.S. Rose Park is a public park in Edgehill at 1000 Edgehill Avenue, east of 12th Avenue and adjacent to both Carter-Lawrence Elementary School and the Rose Park Middle School. It opened in 1963 as a segregated park for African Americans in Nashville and is 55 years old this year.

The site of E.S. Rose Park is central to the history of the Edgehill neighborhood. Beginning around 1830, former Nashville mayor Robert Brownlee Currey and other slaveholding white Nashvillians lived in country residences on and around Rose Park, then called Meridian Hill. Many African Americans worked in these homes and farms, but the rapid growth of the African American population of this area came with the Civil War. During these years, Meridian Hill became the site of Fort Morton (a companion to Fort Negley opposite the Franklin Turnpike), an African American “contraband camp,” and then “New Bethel,” the African American community that later developed into Edgehill.

Meridian Hill was proposed as a park (and reservoir) location as early as the 1880s but instead became a city quarry known as Rock Crusher Hill. The Civil War history of the site was not forgotten, and the Ku Klux Klan announced its return to Nashville at a cross burning there in 1923 attended by about 1,500 members and initiates.

The creation of E.S. Rose Park in the early 1960s occurred in the context of urban renewal, which reshaped much of the Edgehill neighborhood. The park was named in memory of Reverend E.S. Rose of the Greater Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church, and the Easley Memorial Center, was named in memory of Reverend Thomas Henry Easley of New Hope Baptist Church. The park served the Edgehill neighborhood and Nashville as an entirely public park for over four decades.

How is Belmont in a Nashville park?

The Metro Nashville Government approved the original Belmont-Rose Park lease in 2007. The Organized Neighbors of Edgehill (ONE) opposed the lease agreement through the legislative process, the courts, and direct protest. ONE lost its final judicial appeal at the end of 2009. In 2010 Metro Council Members Mike Jameson and Jamie Hollin filed — but then withdrew — a bill to rescind the Belmont-Rose Park lease on the basis of Nashville’s non-discrimination values and policies. Belmont proceeded with its construction plans and celebrated the opening of the current athletic complex in May 2011.

This history is recent and well documented online:

Belmont News, January 2006

Nashville Scene, March 2007

Parks Board minutes, May 2007

Parks Board minutes, September 2007

Belmont Vision, November 2007

State Appeals Court Ruling, December 2009

Belmont Vision, January 2010

Nashville Scene, December 2010

Belmont Vision, February 2011

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s